Our group found this article from Time magazine concerning the Israeli/Palestinian conflict very interesting:
http://tinyurl.com/ykul6nk
The article discusses how both sides in the conflict are using the politics of archaeology surrounding Jerusalem’s Temple Mount to inform their respective nationalist narratives and provides a good opportunity to compare two mutually defining, deeply causally interlinked cases of rival nationalisms.
Ariel Sharon, accompanied by security personnel, visits the Temple Mount
The Temple Mount is a contested site that has tremendous resonance to both sides as both a national and religious symbol. Its importance is illustrated by the fact that the second intifada was initiated in response to a visit to the site by Ariel Sharon in September 2000. Moreover, the failure of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process at the Camp David Summit in July 2000 was, in no small part, due to the inability of the parties to come to agreement over the sovereignty of the Temple Mount complex. In a recent paper, Ofir Abu identified three dynamics that contributed to the deadlock.
“First, the high volume of hybridization of secularism and religion as manifested in the way both Israelis and Palestinians framed their claims for sovereignty over the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif. Second, the Israelis and the Palestinians were caught in a process of “secularity outbidding,” where each of them blamed the other for introducing theology into the process, while they themselves kept the political discussion rational. Third, the conflicting sides were also entangled in “religiosity outbidding,” where each side attempted to prove that their historic and religious right is stronger and much more valid than the other’s right.” (Abu 2008: 1)
These complex dynamics illustrate why this is such an interesting case to analyse.
In our presentation we shall explore further why this is a case of mutually defining nationalisms and consider how this narrative is not only contested between the Israelis and Palestinians but also how it is contested within each camp. Do you think this a nationalist conflict, a religious conflict or a mixture of both?
There is a video that accompanies the Time article here:
http://tinyurl.com/yhqml4a
Finally, for a detailed Israeli view of the issue please look at this article:
http://tinyurl.com/ybg8n2s
References
Abu, Ofir (2008). “Nationalism, Religion, and the Breakdown of the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process”. (Paper prepared for the 66th Annual Conference of the Mid-Western Political Science Association, 2008.) Available online: http://tinyurl.com/yegopot
Read Full Post »
You must be logged in to post a comment.